-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
Just for fun I made a VB.Net version of the C# code -- also CLS (ISO/IEC 23271:2012) complaint. Truth be told, I'm more comfortable with VB.Net. It showed in the C# version, so today I removed those shocking/offending bits ;-) Both compiled DLLs obviously produce identical results, except that the VB.Net version is faster, coming in consistently at 0.08 ms per ua-string compared to C#'s 0.11 ms ! A compiler thing, for sure. So, I'll be using the version compiled from VB.Net, thank you :-) Anyway, having reached around 96% match with the results from the 'old' resolver, I think we should stop comparing, seeing as we now know the differences are either due to 'faulty' builder-resource patterns or bugs in the old resolver. Enjoy the rest of the weekend, esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR4dWeAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcs1sIAJbyoDNSqRu3xGtPYGKO7FHa 33qCc/WdD0XFdEs+twE+OqBKGvxmM9H+zBb1p+xDAd17e/Qssvy1Bb4ItyE5ray8 cmITtMmBVVeLEeViLGSMLVq48cHiHBEINS+V2ovNF0qY+LT17/D4DjmsTchyYWfP vaMz1vUBHi33MK49wF6b0UxVyU9fVthOPkBTv1YQa6MlNKYuCgMtcOfAI84ZxrEv F7uSDIIRZVz9d1FLijP1wAbtMofuRgioHLspkObgWGNqqG4uqQBzPvjbYVK+++4k 9USI4TV7cpgJnxpCZkJPoQNwB/e39XRm0FX4YAtENSvRoMmO5k9OYzDVtQ5jsPs= =PcmW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
