ok, I think I understand. I will review the API and see how best to integrate it and expose it.
________________________________ From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> To: Reza <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 10:40 AM Subject: Re: W3C Simple DDR (was Access) It is the actual "org.w3c.*" DDR Simple API that our Java libraries (especially "devicemap-ddr-simple") implement. You may have noticed at least one Maven module currently disabled in the POM because this API is not available anywhere. OpenDDR so far suggested to manually install it into a local Maven repo, but that is rather inconvenient. Few W3C APIs like some "CSS" related stuff made their way into MavenCentral, this one I assume was finalized too early for Maven to be widely used around 2008, or W3C simply didn't care? On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: >> improve the visibility of the actual W3C Simple DDR artifacts in Maven > > >Can you explain what this is? It is just a reference API? How is this >different than building W3C Simple DDR compatibility and support in the Java >API? > > > >________________________________ > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; >Reza <[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 10:28 AM >Subject: Re: Access > > > >Btw. not sure if I created a separate task for that, or used the "Maven repo" >one piggy-back (especially while we could not assign particular groups of >tasks to certain people) but one thing we might want to improve the visibility >of the actual W3C Simple DDR artifacts in Maven. The most recent release was >exposed on GitHub, and I copied it to our "dist" section, but ideally either >that needs to be used by all subsequent build steps or even deployed into a >Maven repository (if there is no license reason why it hasn't been put there >yet) > > > >Werner > > >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: > >So regarding the W3C simple ddr, thats close to the top of the task list for >me (or anyone else who wants to help). >> >>Feel free to re-assign it, etc. >> >>I already stubbed out how its going to work: >> >>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/devicemap/trunk/devicemap/java/classifier/src/main/java/org/apache/devicemap/DeviceMapW3CSimpleDDR.java?view=markup >> >> >>Basically, the W3C DDR interface will just wrap around the DeviceMapClient >>and provide all the W3C services as a wrapper. >> >>So my thoughts are that this project should just have 1 java API (client), >>which is the one I rewrote from scratch last year. The old ODDR client should >>be archived since no one can support it and it has a list of issues. >> >> >>________________________________ >> From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> >>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 6:51 AM >>Subject: Re: Access >> >> >> >> >>Yes, assigned. If we can change assignment of tasks now, we should be able to >>address it. >>The "Simple DDR Java Client" and the "Classifier" are separate clients, I >>don't think we'd immediately merge them into one, at least not without losing >>W3C compatibility >> >> >> >> >>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Not sure, if some of us have admin or delegate right to JIRA tickets, as >>>> this one should probably be owned by me as the main user: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-35 >>> >>>What do you mean by "owned"? If it's "assigned to" you should be able >>>to reassign, if Reza agrees. >>> >>>-Bertrand >>> > > >
