It so far is a detail of the implementation that's not exposed. Only a private method refers to it. How would that change?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw it. You had moved it into the loader.impl package. It doesnt belong > there because its not a loader implementation. It goes into the > loader.parser package since its a parser... When we add more parsers, they > will go into that package as well. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Werner Keil <[email protected]> > *To:* "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>; Reza <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 8, 2014 3:11 PM > *Subject:* Re: DeviceMap data and java client 1.0.0 release review ready > > OK, I did the refactoring of the parser, you'll noticed it during the > commit/update. > > Actually it seems you missed it Please try to update before the next > commit, so a tagged version no longer exposes a class that's not used > outside... > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Reza <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I have updated the devicemap data and java client release: > > http://www.rezsoft.org/devicemap/ > > > Changes: > > -fixed the LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER. I also added these to individual > projects to simplify releasing. > -added a README > -removed all the @author comments > -changed version from 1.0 to 1.0.0 > -I changed the java client artifact id from devicemap-java to > devicemap-client > -I moved some classes around in the loader package so they are better > organized > > If all looks good, I will create the tag for this release. > > > > >
