That does not have any relevance to USING that JAR AFAIK, which is what the SimpleDDR does and always did. That is exactly what the project accepted from OpenDDR, that JAR (see "HowTo") was always there. I simplified the build. It doesn't require an explicit dependency now, and we won't get a dismantled W3C WG to do that, so that's going to be the permanent solution I assume.
I'll comment out the Maven dependency. It makes IDEs behave nicer, but unless we get the result of the Maven-JAR copy to place it with our own artifacts, IDE users will have to live with the missing dependency or manually resolve that. Then the Maven build should go through for the entire Java sub-tree[?] Werner On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ...It is simply a clone of this: > > https://github.com/fnk/w3c-ddr ... > > You cannot simply "clone" random code to an Apache project repository. > Apache only accepts voluntary contributions, and the iCLA that you > signed to become a committer says: > > > 4. You represent that you are legally entitled to grant the above > > license... > > > ...5. You represent that each of Your Contributions is Your original > > creation (see section 7 for submissions on behalf of others)... > > So any code that you commit needs to be either your own creation, or > something that's been explicitly donated to us. > > I see that the contrib/w3c stuff has been deleted now, so case closed > - just wanted to clarify for next time. > > -Bertrand >
