Data pretty much is. I saw at least one file changed in the trunk since the 1.0.0 release. Only NOTICE, but to be precise data's trunk now also should be 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT. Until there is a repository where stable releases can be grabbed from, the temporary workspace availability of them in a trunk-only Maven build means, all Maven-built clients should refer only to the trunk version of the data files.
If we had a stable 1.0.0 available somewhere, that could differ for different APIs or more importantly examples, too.[?] As my keys are also in the file I plan to get a W3C Simple DDR out, that probably will not need many more versions than 1.0.0 as the underlying standard is unlikely to change, so as we saw W3C missed putting the standard itself out in a proper Maven repository, doing so with a DeviceMap implementation also makes the W3C library available at least indirectly. Not via Maven, that's not up to us, but e.g. a Web Servlet example shall contain the JAR in a lib folder and together with the DeviceMap JARs from Maven it builds without any annoying "Maven install"[?] Werner > ________________________________ > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > To: Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 1:22 PM > Subject: Re: Reza, you can tally the incubator PMC vote now > > > Btw., seems none of the artifacts already released as 1.0.0 are in a Maven > repo yet. > Especially not here: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/ And I > doubt even the Snapshot equivalent gets a deployment yet. > > For those artifacts that are officially released and approved, could they > go into a maven repository, too? > > Werner > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Reza <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > ...moving forward the Java client will likely see less releases and > > activity and the data will constantly evolve. That's why > > > I'm thinking version in wise they will diverge greatly.... > > > > IMO having (even very) different version numbers between different > > modules is not a problem. > > > > -Bertrand > > >
