Yes, I agree, documentation and user education is very important.
________________________________ From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 2:02 PM Subject: Re: generic desktops, crawler, and generic android I understood it that for the initial release we'd keep it as OMA/OpenDDR did, but see e.g. that Australian site, they also refactored the structure and design of the repo, so we are certainly able to evolve that, too. Even the ones like WURFL with "groups" used what W3C DDR calls "aspect" in a different way. Should existing files like the "OperatingSystemDataSource.xml" be of use, then sure, we could include that. For Device DataSource it is mainly "device" it's talking about. Maybe we might want to put together a document, ideally in the Wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/devicemap/ or on Google Docs. WDYT? On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:05 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > If I understand Reza's latest mail correctly, the suggestion is to > re-introduce the Apsect-aspect [sorry] in some form or another, > separating OS, Browser, device [and possible, as yet unknown > 'aspects'] properties and classification in future releases. > > I'm all for that. > > esjr > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT28jnAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc8nsH/27rpKETE8bArX9tVigZJgJm > YUt7X2/aL6IaqAzmYByUkNRvQbjYaz4sEqoxluiZz25r/WH0eZUPufjP9jn8BVxf > RwU1znLlF+BZvenK4cEVOhzFgYNRz77FAEYYFeaHxEDq1CP/C+fZZssw23NTjh0h > v7jd3oWTI7tgei1BudNNOd3sHvncX9xBcGmUK4G5Yu4LBVKUnIydLYw4ts3GgA/8 > nFFqxNqp4GoigDshgjVP95YDe4AveHwyQN5TVgIZhLYuqxxwjoDSKjWwfXIdVYgM > zUYfQ77s2L1WWNmO22OnIOpQs9lmyeeNdx2QHhVgAa0H0g5UtTi+aI86doYBvks= > =VYHK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
