Just 2 replies inline here

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:31 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]>
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Picking up some of Werner's points :
>
> > Wikipedia once offered to "crawl" and collect UA data, not sure, if
> > that ever came and where it is now?
> Wow, did I miss that offer ?
> If they made that offer and it's still open : *yes* please !
>
> I'll be updating the user-agent collection with what I have recently
> 'harvested' [live logs], but you can never have enough of those things !
>
> > The initial "Open_DB" / OMA sources were OK, but I don't believe
> > they are still actively maintained either.
>
> I have that in an RDBMS, as well as the OMA UaProf properties for over
> 90% of those devices.
>

Could they somehow be converted into a W3C DDR (or whatever we might turn
to later) form to amend "live data", too?[?]


>
> Werner also mentions OMA : well, I'd say that's pretty simple :
> building or strengthening relations with  OMA, to be in 'on the ground
> floor' as it were, with any information on devices, IoT [the next
> generation devices] OMA standards etc would certainly be a great thing !
>
>
I'm afraid the focus of OMA shifted mostly to "more or less real time
management" of devices used commercially. E.g. to ensure, an employee won't
use the company phone at home or install any "dodgy apps" on it. Some of
the old "capabilities" probably matter, but any sort of DB or storage is
much more focussed on state of a device or group of devices rather than UI
and UX.

Certain properties like the OS (and if it was updated,...) may of course
matter to them, but I don't see any notable activity outside a draft of
"OMA DM 2". See an ETSI document
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103000_103099/103092/01.01.01_60/ts_103092v010101p.pdf
probably referring to 1.x state, but 2.x won't be too different or suddenly
add put more emphasis on device detection.

Werner


>
> esjr
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT3/uWAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc3jwH/iix7/cvqDJf2gT/AgUhO9lS
> +HXBgwkc/NcabTUtDgV3Gix5GNh3VDMTWH7aezByYAe/1QsxvHLPhBPR+bTvh6dh
> caXoDtzdRyKKJ2opOZ5kbmr1n0GiHHptm0IBnOLWV6MBnglZqN9LYISHUBAvdyIu
> zTvAqL1+6AmF8Ik1zvkkstgeG8qdx7i4gvU+fI69gJ4vy6bWny7lZEWcu2UsSec4
> GNq1fo4Ac+O/eRyW8MZH0bX2ZVgkAX/0Cob32/qx327h5j8F5m0c18lHL4njj6Q7
> Fx+Kz75P2Rgyy2KYmG65nnxrAmHwM3wk+N/ygl1Px7TfNPxn8yNhjI52tuvHndY=
> =Lys5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Reply via email to