On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:10:30PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >> Greg and Kay, >> >> This is a patch from a larger series of OF related cleanup patches. This >> one adds a new 'of_node' member to struct device, conditional upon >> CONFIG_OF. The goal is to move of_node out of archdata because all >> arches using CONFIG_OF need it. >> >> Before I commit too much effort down this path, I want to get your >> feedback. Do you have any objections to this change to struct device? >> >> @@ -414,6 +415,9 @@ struct device { >> override */ >> /* arch specific additions */ >> struct dev_archdata archdata; >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF >> + struct device_node *of_node; >> +#endif > > No objection from me, but do we really need the #ifdef here?
I added the #ifdef because it is complete dead weight when CONFIG_OF is not set. However, I'll defer to your preference here on what looks cleaner w.r.t. maintenance. >> Full patch follows... > > Do you want to take this patch through your tree? If so, feel free to > add: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> I'll take it through my tree. I've got a lot of related patches that it should be grouped with, and I'm going to defer it to the 2.6.35 merge window so that it can get some linux-next exposure. > to the patch. > > If not, let me know and I'll take it through my tree. > > Glad to see this work coming along, nice job. Thanks! Cheers, g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
