On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 06 January 2010 16:31:00 Jeremy Kerr wrote: >> Russell, >> >> > This is something which should be separate from the rest of the DT >> > patch - could we have this as a patch which can be applied to the >> > current kernel tree please? >> >> Sure, patch coming. >> >> The first three patches of this series (prefixed with arm:, rather than >> arm- dt:) are all generic arm patches that don't specifically add device >> tree support, would you like the other two as well? >> >> I'm in the process of rebasing my work onto a merge or your and Grant >> Likely's test-devicetree branch, so future patches should be easier to work >> with. >> >> Cheers, > > What's the current status on the device tree for arm stuff? > > I'm going through some of my todo bookmarks and stumbled across > http://lwn.net/Articles/367752/ and I'd like to poke at it under qemu. > > I've been patching the kernel kconfig stuff to let me plug various different > arm > processors into a versatile board (because it's convinced that you can't > possibly have an armv6l versatilepb and qemu's -cpu option makes that easy). > Feeding in a device tree (or better yet teaching qemu to generate one) sounds > like a better long-term approach...
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ARMDeviceTrees g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
