_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
It seems to me that there are plausible use cases for both
direct-inclusion and indirection. I don't see any real problems with
either, so I would vote for specifying both alternatives.
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE... M. Warner Losh
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Grant Likely
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Scott Wood
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Scott Wood
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Mitch Bradley
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Grant Likely
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Scott Wood
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Grant Likely
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Grant Likely
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Scott Wood
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding f... Grant Likely
