On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:22:21 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Andres Salomon <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 04:07:34 +0000 > > > - For the pdt, calling into the prom once for each property/node to > > create a fdt, and then unflattening it. This is better than the > > previous option, but I don't think the prom->fdt code will be > > very nice. > > I'll need this on sparc64 at some point to support kexec() anyways. > > So at least for sparc you can assume that a something-->fdt translator > is going to exist at some point in the future regardless of what > happens here. > Sounds like we have a winner. I'll concentrate on that, thanks for the heads up. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
