On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This removes an architecture dependency, making the code more generic.

A similar change will be in linux-next today.  :-)  I've recently
updated my next-devicetree and test-devicetree branches if you would
like to rebase.

g.

> ---
>  drivers/of/fdt.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index b6987bb..d61fda8 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ int __init of_scan_flat_dt(int (*it)(unsigned long node,
>                        u32 sz = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)p);
>                        p += 8;
>                        if (be32_to_cpu(initial_boot_params->version) < 0x10)
> -                               p = _ALIGN(p, sz >= 8 ? 8 : 4);
> +                               p = ALIGN(p, sz >= 8 ? 8 : 4);
>                        p += sz;
> -                       p = _ALIGN(p, 4);
> +                       p = ALIGN(p, 4);
>                        continue;
>                }
>                if (tag != OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE) {
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int __init of_scan_flat_dt(int (*it)(unsigned long node,
>                }
>                depth++;
>                pathp = (char *)p;
> -               p = _ALIGN(p + strlen(pathp) + 1, 4);
> +               p = ALIGN(p + strlen(pathp) + 1, 4);
>                if ((*pathp) == '/') {
>                        char *lp, *np;
>                        for (lp = NULL, np = pathp; *np; np++)
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ unsigned long __init of_get_flat_dt_root(void)
>                p += 4;
>        BUG_ON(be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)p) != OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE);
>        p += 4;
> -       return _ALIGN(p + strlen((char *)p) + 1, 4);
> +       return ALIGN(p + strlen((char *)p) + 1, 4);
>  }
>
>  /**
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void *__init of_get_flat_dt_prop(unsigned long node, 
> const char *name,
>                noff = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)(p + 4));
>                p += 8;
>                if (be32_to_cpu(initial_boot_params->version) < 0x10)
> -                       p = _ALIGN(p, sz >= 8 ? 8 : 4);
> +                       p = ALIGN(p, sz >= 8 ? 8 : 4);
>
>                nstr = find_flat_dt_string(noff);
>                if (nstr == NULL) {
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ void *__init of_get_flat_dt_prop(unsigned long node, 
> const char *name,
>                        return (void *)p;
>                }
>                p += sz;
> -               p = _ALIGN(p, 4);
> +               p = ALIGN(p, 4);
>        } while (1);
>  }
>
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void *__init unflatten_dt_alloc(unsigned long 
> *mem, unsigned long size,
>  {
>        void *res;
>
> -       *mem = _ALIGN(*mem, align);
> +       *mem = ALIGN(*mem, align);
>        res = (void *)*mem;
>        *mem += size;
>
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(unsigned long mem,
>        *p += 4;
>        pathp = (char *)*p;
>        l = allocl = strlen(pathp) + 1;
> -       *p = _ALIGN(*p + l, 4);
> +       *p = ALIGN(*p + l, 4);
>
>        /* version 0x10 has a more compact unit name here instead of the full
>         * path. we accumulate the full path size using "fpsize", we'll rebuild
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(unsigned long mem,
>                noff = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)((*p) + 4));
>                *p += 8;
>                if (be32_to_cpu(initial_boot_params->version) < 0x10)
> -                       *p = _ALIGN(*p, sz >= 8 ? 8 : 4);
> +                       *p = ALIGN(*p, sz >= 8 ? 8 : 4);
>
>                pname = find_flat_dt_string(noff);
>                if (pname == NULL) {
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(unsigned long mem,
>                        *prev_pp = pp;
>                        prev_pp = &pp->next;
>                }
> -               *p = _ALIGN((*p) + sz, 4);
> +               *p = ALIGN((*p) + sz, 4);
>        }
>        /* with version 0x10 we may not have the name property, recreate
>         * it here from the unit name if absent
> --
> 1.5.6.6
>
>
>
> This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named 
> recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, 
> privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any 
> attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.
>
>
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to