On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Grant, > >> To match the behaviour of mach_type probing >> >> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> Hi Jeremy, >> >> I've got this patch in my tree. I'm going to squash it into "arm/dt: >> probe for platforms via the device tree". > > Looks good. How do you want to manage the trees from here? Are you going > to adopt my arm-dt branch (and related branches), or should I keep > maintaining it?
I'm treating my tree as a staging point for linux-next; so I'm happy to cherry pick and stabilize patches, but unfortunately it also means I'm going to continue to rebase a lot, which could mess you up a lot. Let's talk about it on IRC tomorrow night (morning for you) g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
