From: Grant Likely <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:44:10 -0700
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:46:16AM -0800, David Miller wrote: >> From: David Daney <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:54:31 -0800 >> >> > The 88E1149R is 10/100/1000 quad-gigabit Ethernet PHY. The >> > .config_aneg function can be shared with 88E1118, but it needs its own >> > .config_init. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: David Daney <[email protected]> >> >> Please resend this when you've respun patch #1 based upon the feedback >> you've been given. > > It looks to me that this patch has no dependencies on the first patch. > ddaney; what say you? It absolutely does, it references a function create by patch #1 In fact it's the whole _entire_ point of patch #1, to allow patch #2 to be possible. Did you even check? Otherwise I would waste his time asking for a respin. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
