On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Grant Likely <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The dtb isn't so much bigendian as it is network byte order. > > (For me, "network byte order" is a euphemism ... <insert > unconstructive rant here>)
I concur. > However I digress... it sounds like you are familiar with the > arguments I would make, and I'm not trying to get into an endianness > war ;) I think this is the same issue as for filesystems. Having different endianness in use might only lead to confusion when a piece of data can be externally provided. And since DT was created on PPC first then that naturally decided on the endianness for it. Nicolas _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
