On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:51:52PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:47:08 -0700 > Grant Likely <[email protected]> wrote: > > This addresses one of my comments on v2; but it doesn't address the > > comment that the broken implementation of of_pdt_node_name for > > non-sparc still remains, or am I missing something? > > > > g. > > > > > I responded to that - > http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg08058.html
Weird; that reply didn't show up in my inbox (but my mailer did receive it, so it is definitely a problem on my end). I'll reply now... g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
