On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:06:06 -0700
Grant Likely <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andres Salomon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:42:34 -0700
> > Grant Likely <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> If firmware is buggy, then pkg2path must deal with it.  It is not
> >> okay for it to return NULL.  (I know that pkg2path is an OFW
> >> command, but in this context it really means the linux wrapper to
> >> pkg2path which has the semantics, "give me the unique, full and
> >> accurate path for this node").  If OFW pkg2path doesn't work, then
> >> the platform code must work around it.  I'm pushing back on this
> >> because I do not want to see platform workarounds in the common
> >> code.
> >
> > I'm fine with that, I just don't want to see BUG() happening that
> > early.  I think a workaround should be handled in common code.  I
> > agree that heroic workarounds for firmware bugs should be handled in
> > arch-specific pkg2path hooks, but a simple workaround in common code
> > is better than just crashing early in boot (imo).
> 
> Alright, you've swayed me a bit.  I've made this change and pushed it
> out to devicetree/experimental.  I've also picked up your other patch.
>  Let me know if it works for you.


Thanks, that looks good.  Feel free to push into next.

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to