On 03/17/2011 11:27 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
The patch below also looks right to me. I believe it also has the advantage of u-boot already knowing how to update the local-mac-address property at boot time.
In my (tested, working, complete) patch series, I allow platform_data based override of MAC at usbnet level, so all the drivers can benefit from it.
Is this not a case of "small thinking" from a Device Tree perspective that Arnd's patch only targets smsc95xx? Or did I miss some disadvantage to allowing this functional configuration option at usbnet layer?
-Andy _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
