Hi Shawn,

> It fixes the return value of funciont early_init_dt_scan_memory on
> the success return path.

[In general, the changelog should explain why you're making this change,
not just re-iterate what the patch does. Does this fix a problem you
were seeing?]

With regards to this specific patch - I don't think this is correct; if
we return 1 here, we'll abort the of_scan_flat_dt loop after
successfully parsing one memory node, whereas machines may have multiple
nodes. This change will break booting on those machines.

Cheers,


Jeremy

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to