On Wed, 4 May 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]> [110429 12:11]: > > I don't think the DT data is that huge, but that's a point in favor of > > doing it in the zImage code. We'll just need to feed the total size of > > the uncompressed kernel .bss section to zImage when compiling it. > > One more thing to consider though.. I don't think we want to copy the > DT data twice. It's not big right now, but could get large if we pass > all the clocks in it. > > So this should be probably fixed in the original patch.. John got > any thoughts on that?
No. The original patch is good (and complex) enough as it is now. It already required 3 rounds of reviews before it was right. This should be fixed in a subsequent patch. Nicolas _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
