On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:59:55AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> My perspective is that cut/pasting the entire SoC definition into a board >> definition is the devicetree equivalent of having more than one driver >> per chip, not sharing gpio/pinmux/... code, etc. in the kernel; the very >> stuff that caused Linus to complain about the state of ARM Linux. > > Very strongly agreed, we've had to do that in the past because of > limitations in the device tree infrastructure but if we end up having to > cut'n'paste that's not going to be great for maintainability.
+2 cut'n'paste is not an option. period. :-) g. > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
