On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:21:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 18 June 2011 17:19:12 Shawn Guo wrote:
> >
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible : should be "fsl,<soc>-uart", "fsl,imx-uart"
> > +- reg : address and length of the register set for the device
> > +- interrupts : should contain uart interrupt
> > +- id : should be the port ID defined by soc
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- fsl,has-rts-cts : indicate it has rts-cts
> > +- fsl,irda-mode : support irda mode
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > +uart@73fbc000 {
> > +   compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx-uart";
> > +   reg = <0x73fbc000 0x4000>;
> > +   interrupts = <31>;
> > +   id = <1>;
> > +   fsl,has-rts-cts;
> > +};
> 
> Should this also support the "clock-frequency" property that 8250-style
> serial ports support [1]?
> 
I would ignore it for a while until we have common clock api and
corresponding binding settled.  For now, I would have nothing clock
related parsed from device tree.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to