On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ah, we're having an impedance mismatch. I'm thinking specifically >> about the device tree compiler and some syntactic sugar for using the >> label definition to generate /also/ create alias properties. The >> hairiness is related to that and the way that dtc is implemented, not >> with the final aliases themselves. > > You can generate DTC-style aliases from OFW-style aliases instead (or > as well), it has other advantages (like being more readable, and having > the aliases grouped together).
There is no difference between OFW and DTC aliases as far as I'm aware. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
