On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:19:25AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > @@ -689,7 +728,7 @@ static int imx_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> > >           }
> > >   }
> > >  
> > > - if (!cpu_is_mx1()) {
> > > + if (IS_IMX2_UART()) {
> > 
> > The logic is getting reversed here, is this really what you want to
> > do?  I would think you'd want to preserve the !IS_IMX1_UART() logic.
> > 
> Maybe not.  I actually made a small improvement here.  The body of
> the 'if' is really IMX2 specific code, so it makes more sense to use
> IS_IMX2_UART() than !IS_IMX1_UART().

Okay, it would probably be worth mentioning this change in the commit text.

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to