On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:23:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Engineering names are more stable than marketing names. Hence, use them
> for Device Tree compatible properties instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
> ---
> Grant, this is against devicetree/arm, and only makes sense there; I'll
> send a separate patch for the equivalent change in devicetree/test, since
> the file is radically different there.
devicetree/arm actually does track devicetree/test, just a subset of
the patches in it (although it isn't obvious since I use stgit to make
devicetree/arm a stable branch that never rebases.
I'll make sure both devicetree/arm and devicetree/test are fixed up.
g.
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts
> index 81032e7..4ad8ade 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts
> @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
>
> / {
> model = "NVIDIA Tegra2 Harmony evaluation board";
> - compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra250";
> + compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra20";
> };
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
