On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:55:12 +0100 Jamie Iles <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm, get_maintainer.pl got Artem's address wrong (old Nokia address) for > gpio-nand.c so correct one on CC now! > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:45:01PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:03:30 +0100 > > Jamie Iles <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpio-nand.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpio-nand.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..98cb152 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpio-nand.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > > > +GPIO assisted NAND flash > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible : "gpio-nand" > > > +- reg : should specify localbus chip select and size used for the chip. > > > For > > > + ARM platforms where a dummy read is needed to provide synchronisation > > > with > > > + regards to bus reordering, an optional second resource describes the > > > + location to read from. > > > > I don't see how a pure "gpio nand" device would have any memory mapped > > I/O. I think you need a more specific compatible for this. > > OK, fair point. I'm not sure what a better name would be though, maybe > gpio-assisted-nand? Not sure, but if the name is generic at all the binding should thorougly describe what is expected of the hardware. -Scott _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
