On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 16:12 +0100, Jamie Iles wrote:
> +static int gpio_nand_of_get_options(struct device *dev,
> + struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)
> +{
> + u32 width;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "bank-width", &width)) {
> + if (width == 2) {
> + plat->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> + } else if (width != 1) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid bank-width %u\n", width);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_nand_of_get_gpio(struct device *dev,
> + struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)
> +{
> + plat->gpio_rdy = of_get_gpio(dev->of_node, 0);
> + plat->gpio_nce = of_get_gpio(dev->of_node, 1);
> + plat->gpio_ale = of_get_gpio(dev->of_node, 2);
> + plat->gpio_cle = of_get_gpio(dev->of_node, 3);
> + plat->gpio_nwp = of_get_gpio(dev->of_node, 4);
> +}
> +
> +static void gpio_nand_of_get_chip_delay(struct device *dev,
> + struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)
> +{
> + u32 chip_delay;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "chip-delay", &chip_delay))
> + plat->chip_delay = (int)chip_delay;
> +}
> +
> +static int gpio_nand_of_get_config(struct device *dev,
> + struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)
> +{
> + int ret = gpio_nand_of_get_options(dev, plat);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + gpio_nand_of_get_gpio(dev, plat);
> + gpio_nand_of_get_chip_delay(dev, plat);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Do we really need to have 3 additional helper functions for
'gpio_nand_of_get_config()' ?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
