Hi Thomas,

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:25:17PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>  static int samsung_keypad_is_s5pv210(struct device *dev)
>  {
>       struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> -     enum samsung_keypad_type type =
> -             platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> +     enum samsung_keypad_type type;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +     if (dev->of_node)
> +             return of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
> +                             "samsung,s5pv210-keypad");
> +#endif
> +     type = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>       return type == KEYPAD_TYPE_S5PV210;

This function is called every time we scan keypad matrix, I do not think
you want to scan DT bindings here. You need to cache the device type at
probe time and use it.

>  }
>  
> @@ -235,6 +246,130 @@ static void samsung_keypad_close(struct input_dev 
> *input_dev)
>       samsung_keypad_stop(keypad);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static
> +struct samsung_keypad_platdata *samsung_keypad_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct samsung_keypad_platdata *pdata;
> +     struct matrix_keymap_data *keymap_data;
> +     uint32_t *keymap;
> +     struct device_node *np = dev->of_node, *key_np;
> +     unsigned int key_count = 0;
> +
> +     pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!pdata) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "could not allocate memory for platform data\n");
> +             return NULL;
> +     }

pdata is not used once probe() completes so it would be better to free
it and not rely on devm_* facilities to free it for you once device
unbinds from the driver.

> +
> +     of_property_read_u32(np, "samsung,keypad-num-rows", &pdata->rows);
> +     of_property_read_u32(np, "samsung,keypad-num-columns", &pdata->cols);
> +     if (!pdata->rows || !pdata->cols) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "number of keypad rows/columns not specified\n");
> +             return NULL;
> +     }
> +
> +     keymap_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*keymap_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!keymap_data) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "could not allocate memory for keymap data\n");
> +             return NULL;
> +     }
> +     pdata->keymap_data = keymap_data;
> +
> +     for_each_child_of_node(np, key_np)
> +             key_count++;
> +
> +     keymap_data->keymap_size = key_count;
> +     keymap = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(uint32_t) * key_count, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!keymap) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "could not allocate memory for keymap\n");
> +             return NULL;
> +     }
> +     keymap_data->keymap = keymap;
> +
> +     for_each_child_of_node(np, key_np) {
> +             unsigned int row, col, key_code;
> +             of_property_read_u32(key_np, "keypad,row", &row);
> +             of_property_read_u32(key_np, "keypad,column", &col);
> +             of_property_read_u32(key_np, "keypad,key-code", &key_code);
> +             *keymap++ = KEY(row, col, key_code);
> +     }

THis seems like generic mechanism that could be used by other drivers...
Maybe move into matrix-keypad.c? You would also not need to allocate
temporary buffer for intermediate keymap data.

> +
> +     if (of_get_property(np, "linux,input-no-autorepeat", NULL))
> +             pdata->no_autorepeat = true;
> +     if (of_get_property(np, "linux,input-wakeup", NULL))
> +             pdata->wakeup = true;
> +
> +     return pdata;
> +}
> +
> +static void samsung_keypad_parse_dt_gpio(struct device *dev,
> +                             struct samsung_keypad *keypad)
> +{
> +     struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +     int gpio, ret, row, col;
> +
> +     for (row = 0; row < keypad->rows; row++) {
> +             gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "row-gpios", row);
> +             keypad->row_gpios[row] = gpio;
> +             if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "keypad row[%d]: invalid gpio %d\n",
> +                                     row, gpio);
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +
> +             ret = gpio_request(gpio, "keypad-row");
> +             if (ret)
> +                     dev_err(dev, "keypad row[%d] gpio request failed\n",
> +                                     row);
> +     }
> +
> +     for (col = 0; col < keypad->cols; col++) {
> +             gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "col-gpios", col);
> +             keypad->col_gpios[col] = gpio;
> +             if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "keypad column[%d]: invalid gpio %d\n",
> +                                     col, gpio);
> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +
> +             ret = gpio_request(col, "keypad-col");
> +             if (ret)
> +                     dev_err(dev, "keypad column[%d] gpio request failed\n",
> +                                     col);

I think we should bail out if one of the calls fails.

> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static void samsung_keypad_dt_gpio_free(struct samsung_keypad *keypad)
> +{
> +     int cnt;
> +
> +     for (cnt = 0; cnt < keypad->rows; cnt++)
> +             if (gpio_is_valid(keypad->row_gpios[cnt]))
> +                     gpio_free(keypad->row_gpios[cnt]);
> +
> +     for (cnt = 0; cnt < keypad->cols; cnt++)
> +             if (gpio_is_valid(keypad->col_gpios[cnt]))
> +                     gpio_free(keypad->col_gpios[cnt]);
> +}
> +#else
> +static
> +struct samsung_keypad_platdata *samsung_keypad_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +     return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void samsung_keypad_parse_dt_gpio(struct device_node *np,
> +             struct samsung_keypad *keypad, unsigned int rows,
> +             unsigned int cols)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void samsung_keypad_dt_gpio_free(struct samsung_keypad *keypad)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static int __devinit samsung_keypad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       const struct samsung_keypad_platdata *pdata;
> @@ -246,7 +381,10 @@ static int __devinit samsung_keypad_probe(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       unsigned int keymap_size;
>       int error;
>  
> -     pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +     if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> +             pdata = samsung_keypad_parse_dt(&pdev->dev);
> +     else
> +             pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>       if (!pdata) {
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no platform data defined\n");
>               return -EINVAL;
> @@ -303,6 +441,9 @@ static int __devinit samsung_keypad_probe(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       keypad->cols = pdata->cols;
>       init_waitqueue_head(&keypad->wait);
>  
> +     if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> +             samsung_keypad_parse_dt_gpio(&pdev->dev, keypad);
> +
>       input_dev->name = pdev->name;
>       input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
>       input_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -349,6 +490,7 @@ err_free_irq:
>       free_irq(keypad->irq, keypad);
>  err_put_clk:
>       clk_put(keypad->clk);
> +     samsung_keypad_dt_gpio_free(keypad);
>  err_unmap_base:
>       iounmap(keypad->base);
>  err_free_mem:
> @@ -374,6 +516,7 @@ static int __devexit samsung_keypad_remove(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       free_irq(keypad->irq, keypad);
>  
>       clk_put(keypad->clk);
> +     samsung_keypad_dt_gpio_free(keypad);
>  
>       iounmap(keypad->base);
>       kfree(keypad);
> @@ -447,6 +590,17 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops samsung_keypad_pm_ops = {
>  };
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id samsung_keypad_dt_match[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-keypad" },
> +     { .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-keypad" },
> +     {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, samsung_keypad_dt_match);
> +#else
> +#define samsung_keypad_dt_match NULL
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct platform_device_id samsung_keypad_driver_ids[] = {
>       {
>               .name           = "samsung-keypad",
> @@ -465,6 +619,7 @@ static struct platform_driver samsung_keypad_driver = {
>       .driver         = {
>               .name   = "samsung-keypad",
>               .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
> +             .of_match_table = samsung_keypad_dt_match,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>               .pm     = &samsung_keypad_pm_ops,
>  #endif
> -- 
> 1.6.6.rc2
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to