On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:51:49PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 04:15:40PM -0700, Anton Staaf wrote: > > With this patch the following property assignment: > > > > property = ['a' 2b '\r']; > > > > is equivalent to: > > > > property = [61 2b 0d]; > > So, I still have some reservations about this syntax. > > It occurred to me: do you actually need to intermix character and > hexbyte values that much? Could I suggest an alternate sytax as: > > property = 'a', [2b], 'r'; > > The new character literals sufficiently distinct not to cause problems > here, and it maintains the , == bytestring append behaviour we already > have. > > Thoughts?
Does it matter much? I'm happy with either. Is there a downside to the first syntax? g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
