Hi, On Tue, Sep 20 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote at Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:43 AM: >> On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: >> > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each >> > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >> > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next >> > branch, >> > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch? >> > >> >> Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should >> go into the same one. >> >> If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch. > > Chris applied them to the mmc-next tree: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git > > which appears to be temporarily at: > > git://dev.laptop.org/users/cjb/mmc
Sending these via Arnd's next/dt sounds good to me. I know we'd usually take changes that require an atomic update through the same tree, but Stephen said in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/352 : I don't think there's actually any need for that; initializing Tegra's SDHCI from device-tree has never worked in mainline to date; it relies on patch 1 being there. And if patch 2 was there without patch 3, the worst that will happen is some port runs in 4-bit mode instead of 8-bit, which evidently works fine since I didn't even notice 8-bit support was missing... Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
