On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:51 PM, David Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:53:36PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:38:54PM -0700, David Brown wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:23:25AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> > > There is no centralized listing for the in-use vendor prefixes >> > > used in compatible strings and property names. This patch adds one. >> > > New prefixes should get added to this list to reduce the likelyhood >> > > of namespace collisions. >> > > >> > > +powervr Imagination Technologies >> > > +ramtron Ramtron International >> > >> > qcom is already used by the patches I sent out (and should be in the >> > soc tree). I can make a patch for that, but I guess I first need to >> > ask around here for what company name we should use. >> >> This isn't any kind of "authoritative" list, and it represents who >> makes the components, not who writes the code. I'll use Qualcomm. > > Probably Qualcomm, Inc or Qualcomm Incorporated would be best, but if > you make the change (rather than me) it matters less.
Done. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
