On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:44:04PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > However, it does take Mark's suggestion into account that the mfd > should have some clear representation in the device tree. For us it > already did have (naturally), but this wasn't reflected in my earlier > patch. It is now - the location of the vx855-gpio node is based on > finding the mfd node and going from there.
Why not just kmemdup() the template you're using rather than modifying it in place? _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
