On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:22:19AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [111020 09:31]: > > > > That's where a DT entry specific configuration string might be the best > > option as it still allows describing the hardware using DT standards, > > while also allowing board specific configuration too. > > Hmm, actually, can't we just pass the board specific configuration in > the board specific .dts file and then it gets merged in with the > arch independent DT node?
It would be fine to, say, have a omap-specific board configuration node for collecting things that really don't fit anywhere else. That would be in some ways analogous to the way we've decided to use top a top level node for describing a machines audio complex. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
