On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 17:50 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> Come to think of it, is the problem here that we're trying to describe
> the _motherboard_ using the compatible property on the root node.
> This is why I talked about universal/generic features -- the set of
> features common to all platforms sharing a single motherboard
> configuration.
>
> Arguably that's wrong, and that compatible property belongs on the
> motherboard node itself, so (excuse the random syntax):
>
> / {
> compatible = "arm,vexpress-v2p-ca9", "arm,vexpress";
>
> motherboard {
> compatible = "arm,vexpress-v2m-legacy", "simple-bus";
> };
> };
> If putting a suitable compatible property on the motherboard node is
> feasible, it should work for this case.
Yep, that works for me :-) Probably even easier to implement than custom
property.
I'll get it into the code tomorrow.
Cheers!
Paweł
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
