On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> wrote:
> We should probably pass over > the static board specific mapping as platform_data to the pinmux device > and make it be part of struct pinctrl_dev. Then new driver instances > can have their own pctldev->mapping and we can support both platform_data > and device tree based drivers on the same system. That sounds like a real good idea and I think it'll work fine. You can use the map in mach-u300/core.c as guinea pig for refactoring if you like. I think that's the only map that's in-tree ftm. Thanks, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
