On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:44:48PM -0600, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: > I looked at it a bit when I was generalizing my code, but it seemed > dramatically more complicated than I needed, and I couldn't see any > reasonable way to hook it from the machine_poweroff() code.
Some ST platform had to do odd stuff with regulators to power off, it made a platform device representing the odd poweroff code. > There's also the fact that I was looking for a pure-device-tree type > of driver and the regulator framework does not seem to support the > standard OF-platform probe system. The regulator API in -next has DT bindings. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
