Oh wait, when I saw 3/3 I realized the following too: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Aneesh V <[email protected]> wrote:
> +- phy-type : string indicating the phy type. Should be one of the > + following: > + > + "phy-type-omap4" : PHY used in OMAP4 family of SoCs > + > + "phy-type-dm81xx" : PHY used in DM81XX family of SoCs No, again please don't define new string properties when a simple binary property will do just fine. Just use "phy-type-omap4" or "phy-type-dm81xx" as an empty property to indicate what phy is used. Or encode as an integer and list the valid values here. Every time you add a string to the device tree, the data structure grows, not to mention the fact that it adds a lot of string comparisons during setup. Please keep that in mind when defining bindings. -Olof _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
