On 12/27/2011 04:29 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:26:58 +0100 > >> We have two implementations of kernel_tree_alloc() - one in fdt.c and >> another in pdt.c. >> >> $ grep kernel_tree_alloc * >> fdt.c:static void *kernel_tree_alloc(u64 size, u64 align) >> fdt.c: __unflatten_device_tree(device_tree, mynodes, &kernel_tree_alloc); >> pdt.c:static void * __init kernel_tree_alloc(u64 size, u64 align) >> pdt.c: of_alias_scan(kernel_tree_alloc); >> >> The version in fdt.c is using kzalloc() whereas the version in pdt.c >> uses prom_early_alloc(). >> >> And of_fdt_unflatten_tree() uses the version in fdt.c - so the patch is OK. >> >> It is confusing that they have the same name - but I did nto fix that. >> And I forgot about this detail when I wrote the changelog. > > Ok, I hadn't realized this, thanks for explaining. > > I think Grant should apply your patch then: > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________
I've applied it for 3.3 unless you think it needs to go into 3.2. Rob _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
