On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 03:32:11PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> Drivers shouldn't use NO_IRQ. Microblaze and PPC
> define NO_IRQ as 0 and this reference will be removed
> in near future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
> CC: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> CC: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> CC: Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/input/serio/xilinx_ps2.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/xilinx_ps2.c 
> b/drivers/input/serio/xilinx_ps2.c
> index d64c5a4..f3e54b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/xilinx_ps2.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/xilinx_ps2.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int __devinit xps2_of_probe(struct platform_device 
> *ofdev)
>       }
>  
>       /* Get IRQ for the device */
> -     if (of_irq_to_resource(ofdev->dev.of_node, 0, &r_irq) == NO_IRQ) {
> +     if (!of_irq_to_resource(ofdev->dev.of_node, 0, &r_irq)) {
>               dev_err(dev, "no IRQ found\n");
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> -- 
> 1.7.5.4
> 
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to