On 01/13/2012 02:35 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
My guess is that Linus.W did not get any chance to take the dt case into account with his first design of pinctrl core. But I guess he is open to any reasonable change to pinctrl core for dt adoption. Linus?
Any patches welcome. However we cannot *require* DT for pinctrl to work, there are archs that do not use DT and these must also be able to use pinctrl. For example arch/blackfin have expressed interest IIRC. Then the question of whether to also support mixed configs where some callers get data from DT and some from platform data. I suspect that this is necessary for the single kernel goal. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
