On Thu,  8 Mar 2012 22:03:57 +0530, Aneesh V <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh V <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v4:
> - Rebased to the latest version of EMIF series
> - Replace kzalloc()/kfree() with devm_* variants
> ---
>  drivers/misc/emif.c |  289 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/emif.c b/drivers/misc/emif.c
> index 79fb161..0aaa61e 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/emif.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/emif.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -49,6 +50,7 @@
>   *                           frequency in effect at the moment)
>   * @plat_data:                       Pointer to saved platform data.
>   * @debugfs_root:            dentry to the root folder for EMIF in debugfs
> + * @np_ddr:                  Pointer to ddr device tree node
>   */
>  struct emif_data {
>       u8                              duplicate;
> @@ -63,6 +65,9 @@ struct emif_data {
>       struct emif_regs                *curr_regs;
>       struct emif_platform_data       *plat_data;
>       struct dentry                   *debugfs_root;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +     struct device_node              *np_ddr;
> +#endif

Don't bother with the #if/#endif wrapper here.

>  };
>  
>  static struct emif_data *emif1;
> @@ -1147,6 +1152,270 @@ static int is_custom_config_valid(struct 
> emif_custom_configs *cust_cfgs,
>       return valid;
>  }
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static void __init of_get_custom_configs(struct device_node *np_emif,

__devinit. Same through the rest of the file.

[...]
> +     return NULL;
> +out:
> +     return emif;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct emif_data * __init get_device_details(

This function also must be __devinit

>               struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> @@ -1266,7 +1535,13 @@ static int __init emif_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       struct resource         *res;
>       int                     irq;
>  
> -     emif = get_device_details(pdev);
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +     if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> +             emif = of_get_device_details(pdev->dev.of_node, &pdev->dev);
> +     else
> +#endif
> +             emif = get_device_details(pdev);
> +
>       if (!emif) {
>               pr_err("%s: error getting device data\n", __func__);
>               goto error;
> @@ -1643,11 +1918,23 @@ static void __attribute__((unused)) 
> freq_post_notify_handling(void)
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emif_lock, irq_state);
>  }
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static const struct of_device_id emif_of_match[] = {
> +             { .compatible = "ti,emif-4d" },
> +             { .compatible = "ti,emif-4d5" },
> +             {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, emif_of_match);
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct platform_driver emif_driver = {
>       .remove         = __exit_p(emif_remove),

Not part of this patch I realize, but this is a bug.  .remove must
be in the __devexit section and the __devexit_p() wrapper must
be used.  Similarly, emif_probe must be in the __devinit section.

>       .shutdown       = emif_shutdown,
>       .driver = {
>               .name = "emif",
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +             .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(emif_of_match),
> +#endif

The of_match_ptr() macro makes the #if/#endif wrapper redundant.

Otherwise, on brief review this patch looks right.

g.


>       },
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies,Ltd.
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to