On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:43:24 +0100, Jason Cooper <[email protected]>
wrote:
In a future land where everything has been converted to devicetree, what
would be best? An option to "Build all kirkwood-based .dtb's", an option
to build all D-link .dtb's, Q-QNAP .dtb's, etc. or an option for each
board? I've not got any strong opinion, so will reformat the above to
whatever is considered best.
Based on Grant's comment, I'll probably be working towards a
MACH_GLOBALSCALE_DT option to catch dreamplug,sheevaplug,guruplug, etc.
Perhaps this should be MACH_BUFFALO_DT?
Thinking about it, MACH_DNSKW_DT would probably be best. Anything more
general, e.g. MACH_DLINK_DNS_DT, would also cover the orion-based
DNS-313/323/343. Presumably there will always be differences between
kirkwood and orion5x?
Did you mean D-Link, or is there some relationship between Buffalo and
D-link I'm not aware of? I know Conceptronic sold a ~identical device to
the DNS-323, but not aware of anything else. You never know who truly
makes the devices nowadays anyway.
--
Jamie Lentin
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
