From: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>

Currently most code to get child count in kernel are almost same,
add a helper to implement this function for dt to use.

Cc: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>

---
Rob missed this patch for 3.4 kernel.
Based on Rob's suggestion, we can get it go in with pinctrl driver.
Since Rob once had applied it, i added Rob's ack.
See:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/14/239

changes v3->v4:
 * addressed Grant's suggestion to use for_each_child_of_node.

changes v2->v3:
 Addressed some people's comments:
 * do not use assignment as expression
 * return 0 for non-dt case

Changes v1->v2:
 * change the name from of_get_child_number to of_get_child_count
---
 include/linux/of.h |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index e3f942d..1c14976 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -193,6 +193,17 @@ extern struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct 
device_node *node,
        for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
             child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
 
+static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
+{
+       struct device_node *child = NULL;
+       int num = 0;
+
+       for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
+               num++;
+
+       return num;
+}
+
 extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
        struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
 #define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
@@ -300,6 +311,11 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
 #define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
        while (0)
 
+static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+
 static inline int of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device,
                                          const char *name)
 {
-- 
1.7.0.4


_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to