On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Ah, I see what you mean. But these registers and interrupt are actually >> only visible on the hypervizor side. The guest shouldn't see any of this. > > Rihgt, that makes sense. > >> I suppose we could have a "arm,has-virt-extensions" property in devices >> that implement the virtualization extensions (GIC, timers...). >> >> What do you think? > > Sounds good. I don't have a strong preference whether that should be a > property like you suggest or a separate "compatible" value, maybe Rob or > Grant can comment on what they prefer.
I don't have a strong opinion either way. This approach looks fine. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
