* Mark Brown <[email protected]> [120511 06:12]: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:02:26PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > > > Describing sub nodes, especially for big SoC is pretty useful. > > It is as useful as doing that for board that are sharing similar components. > > The concern here is that the device tree you're writing here is clearly > just a direct translation of the particular stuff Linux happens to use > internally into device tree; this is similar to the thing with using > hwmod in the device tree representation and omitting basic stuff like > the register ranges.
I agree we should not omit the register ranges from DT. That is hardware specific information that other operating systems possibly need, and they don't have hwmod. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
