On 6 June 2012 14:03, Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, sure but the whole series is very "coupled" together... Maybe
> Richard could try to split this series into things that can go through
> arm-soc with no dependency on the other part and things that depend on
> drivers/usb/*
>
As far as arch/arm patches applying concerned, I haven't seen any
dependency on drivers/usb part.  If those patches can be applied on
arm-soc tree and do not break anything, that's good enough.  For usb
to actually function, we will need to wait usb and arm-soc trees get
together somewhere, firstly linux-next, eventually mainline.

Regards,
Shawn
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to