On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
> Related to this, I wonder if we need some scheme to tag individual > bindings as under-development vs. final, and some way to promote > bindings between those states (a bindings review board?!). Hm, we just have Documentation/devicetree/bindings and that's it. But compare to the Documentation/ABI: $ ls obsolete README removed stable testing I think we might want to mirror this structure for the bindings, putting all current bindings into testing. That said, this scheme has not always been very strictly enforced on sysfs etc. But the ambition is there. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
