On 08/20/2012 11:01 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Scott Wood wrote: >> The distinction between "disabled" and "fail" is useful when the OS >> knows how to enable a node (e.g. by manipulating muxing). > > So a node that is marked as status=fail is not necessarily an > unrecoverable failure?
No, it's "disabled" that is not necessarily unrecoverable. -Scott _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
