On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:19:59PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:32:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This feels like the wrong thing to do here: given that the user needs to > > explicitly ask for the device to be instantiated we really ought to be > > one the right bus so this should be more of an error. Not sure what I > > can constructively sugget except for an error message and perhaps > > returning -EINVAL though. > Makes sense. Changing the return value to -EINVAL results in the following > warning message from the driver subsystem. > sc18is602: probe of 7-0010 failed with error -22 > I think this should be good enough, as there are other possible reasons for > the > call to fail which result in similar messages. Do you want to make that > change, > or should I change it and resubmit ? The above looks good, we don't need to go overboard - so long as it's not a silent fail I think we're OK. Please send an incremental change.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
