On Thursday 23 August 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> I was about to say that if Mike has any issues with the driver that I
> can fix the patch conflict at the same time, but I just realised that
> its more work than I originally thought :)
>
> I was going to move the arch-vt8500 part of the clocks patch back into
> the clocks patch - but that will just move the issue from arm-soc to
> clocks because Mike's branch won't have the arch-vt8500 patch so the
> patch will fail.
But that's ok, because without the arch-v8500 part, nothing uses
the vt8500-clock driver, so nothing breaks. You can introduce broken
code in the meantime as long as it's impossible to enable and it will
work afterwards.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
